Mr. Chairman, I know these units have been a welcome option for some tenants, for some folks outside the initial target area. I guess where I am going at and going over history here now, but in terms of the accountability, why did the Housing Corporation decide to deliver 44 units when, obviously, now that we have had a couple of years to work this out, only 14 of them were actually filled by those essential workers, Mr. Chairman. It would seem that we really overshot the true need. Why, then, did the Housing Corporation invest far more money than the demand really warranted? In the meantime, of course, we need to fill these up. There is no sense at all having them empty, so we can go to other potential tenants like the Housing Corporation's own staff, GNWT employees, the private sector and still we note, Mr. Chairman, from the information provided, that 14 of the 44 units are vacant, 13 of them.

So it's not a great track record here, Mr. Chairman, of determining exactly what the size of the need is and then designing the service to suit the need. We really went overboard here. A lot of money tied up where it wasn't essential. This is the accountability that I am asking for. How was it that the service far exceeded what now is shown to be the need?