Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Chairman, as we all know, the intention was to provide the opportunity to government employees first. The second option was to go with government program service delivery agencies in communities such as municipalities, band councils, anyone who provided programs and services in a community. The third option was to go to individuals who may be housing clients who have high incomes who would be able to get out of social housing, but be able to acquire one of these units through ownership. So it wasn't totally directed at people in regards to the professions, but we did allow an opportunity for getting them first right of refusal, so they have the first option going in. Then the second option, because of concerns raised by Members that we had too many vacant units, that we went to other agencies such as
government bodies in communities, hamlet councils, band councils, charter communities. Then the third option was to go to individuals who were providing services, but were in social housing who were paying high rents in social housing, to get them to move out of social housing, go into the Homeownership Program by acquiring these units. That's how they came up with these numbers. I know the Member talked about 145 units, but we do have Housing Corporation staff, like our local housing authorities, and we have people such as our maintainers, our finance people in our communities who are also in these units which are not classified as government individuals, but they still provide a unique service on behalf of the communities. So those people also are in there, but they are not showing up as government staff. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.