Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I won't have a question, but I do have a clarification. I'm speaking about when we lend public money and I think public money follows a different rule than private money. I appreciate that the Minister distinguishes that we use some of the public money to leverage private money, but I still think that because it's the government's money, it's the people's money. We can still play by our rule, which is the disclosure rule. We may not see eye to eye and then again we may never see eye to eye on that point, but it's how I feel and I feel that it's very important in the long run.

I do welcome the fact that the money that has been given out has been leveraged and used in probably many good ways, which is that it has gotten people into private home ownership, which is great, but I still feel differently on the transparency issue.

Just for final clarification on the maintenance management program, it's the focus where I believe it should be under the TSC, the Technical Service Centre perspective as opposed to in the housing department and the skilled staff that I believe should be under that department. It's not so much the fact that they use the program, it's the focus. I'm a firm believer that when the TSC was sort of envisioned that these things would fall under there. So better focus.

Like I said earlier, I'm a firm believer that we need to drop these pens and grab some hammers and the focus of the department of getting houses. I'm glad the Minister acknowledges that there is trouble. We do have land entitlement troubles and I'd like to see us work through those to get houses on the ground for people, so I'll welcome those developments as they come forward to work with that Minister. Thank you.