Thank you, Madam Chair. With due respect, Madam Chair, I guess the Minister can choose to continue to speak on this topic as if he is a paid lobbyist for Novel project, or he could give some commitments on due diligence that I am asking for. I could, as well, do a 10-minute speech on the pros and cons of that. I am not interested in that. I want him to just answer some basic questions so we can move on.

If he wants to keep on doing that, I am prepared to spend the rest of the week debating on the pros and cons of this. So let me just ask a very specific question. I am not asking the merit of building housing or taking advantage of the pipeline project. What I am saying is, I would like to see this Minister taking a driver's seat. We have an opportunity here. The better way for him to be is to, okay, with the federal government and the territorial government spending money and the pipeline coming in, we have a housing opportunity here. What could we do? Okay. He could make a decision. A manufactured home is the way to go. He has done the cost-benefit analysis. Now I am asking, is the Novel concept the only idea in town? If that is so, I am prepared to be convinced. But where is the evidence? Has he asked any other businesses? We have a $297 million project, potentially, between the federal and territorial governments and private investment. What could you do? Could we ask the top five companies in the world? It could be just as well. ATCO, as the Minister has stated, is looking at other areas. That is a huge company. We don't need a Minister and the government lobbying Imperial for one company. I want to know. Has he asked, or is he or the government prepared to ask a question to somebody or at least three businesses, what could you do for us in terms of building the pipeline housing that could be turned into affordable housing? Could he commit to looking into that? Thank you, Madam Chair.