Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Chairman, the fact is that the dollar value of the project remains the same, the community remains the same, the purpose of the facility remains the same and we've informed Members. As we said, a tender was issued in error; it was withdrawn. We've gone back to Cabinet, a letter's been sent to Members, and a final decision. If the project changes in the sense of a higher dollar value, or changes the community again, that would have to come back for a vote in this House. The rest of the steps we've proceeded with and followed. Whether Members disagree with the information they were provided, before that initial decision came to this House we had Members saying that was a good idea. But when it came to this House for decision, all of a sudden it was a big surprise. So I mean we're not going to go back there, Mr. Speaker. The fact is, we followed the process, we're informing Members, there was an error, we've withdrawn that tender and there is no tender issued. Thank you.
Floyd Roland on Question 45-15(5): Change In Scope To Dene K'onia Facility Renovation Project
In the Legislative Assembly on June 2nd, 2006. See this statement in context.
Further Return To Question 45-15(5): Change In Scope To Dene K'onia Facility Renovation Project
Question 45-15(5): Change In Scope To Dene K'onia Facility Renovation Project
Revert To Item 6: Oral Questions
June 1st, 2006
Page 98
See context to find out what was said next.