Mr. Speaker, the Member indicated that he wouldn't go any further, but I think he should go further. If we compare it to the De Beers agreement or Diavik agreement, we have NWT residents that are very similar. It is about providing proof, as one has to do in the MGP SEA, that one is a northern resident. So the standard has not been diminished in that respect. You are still required to provide proof, just as you are in the Diavik agreement, just as you are in the De Beers agreement. Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
Brendan Bell on Question 390-15(5): Residency Requirement Under The Mackenzie Gas Project Socio-economic Agreement
In the Legislative Assembly on February 21st, 2007. See this statement in context.
Return To Question 390-15(5): Residency Requirement Under The Mackenzie Gas Project Socio-economic Agreement
Question 390-15(5): Residency Requirement Under The Mackenzie Gas Project Socio-economic Agreement
Item 6: Oral Questions
February 20th, 2007
Page 1075
See context to find out what was said next.