Yes, okay. The value of it certainly does not escape me. The Minister said, well, it's hypothetical if the project doesn't go. It's hypothetical if the project is going to go, Mr. Minister. So we are making very optimistic and forward-looking investments that I support, but what I wanted to explore...I know the Minister understands this. If we get a definite decision that says no, the project cannot or will not happen, what then? Are we going to continue making these multi-million dollar expenditures, Mr. Chairman, if there is no likelihood of a return? That's what I wanted to know. Not that there aren't other economic reasons in the Mackenzie Valley to make these kind of bridge programs worthwhile, but I am wondering what is the linkage to the gas project itself and the viability of this bridge project if the gas project is not to be?