Mr. Chairman, I don't hear another question. Let me say that we are proposing, and will propose, to put GNWT money towards this project and we would like to do it in a manner that makes it a candidate to lever additional federal resources. So how we cash flow this project we think is important. Yes, we have pinned a lot on this project because it may be more important than any other project we have in front of us that is at a stage where it's viable. It has the potential to probably offset the most GHG emissions that that is what we will underpin our energy plan. Members talked earlier about adaptation and mitigation. Those two elements, those two prongs of a strategy. We agree that those are the critical components. What we want to do is see GHGs offset and see a reduction. So we are proposing that this project can do a lot of that. Again, I look forward to more discussion with Members on this in the coming weeks.
Brendan Bell on Committee Motion 46-15(5): Future Socio-economic Agreements, Carried
In the Legislative Assembly on March 5th, 2007. See this statement in context.
Committee Motion 46-15(5): Future Socio-economic Agreements, Carried
Item 19: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
March 5th, 2007
Page 1187
See context to find out what was said next.