Thank you, Mr. Chair. I know there has been a lot of work put into the whole process already. I am not really one to say that we should just push it aside and change our direction, but I am saying I think in a lot of those sections of resource revenue, the packages are already completed or they should be completed by now. Why can't we settle on those parts of the package so that we have some revenue coming in, put it aside, put the revenue aside until we can iron out the issues of how we are going to divvy it up? But at least we are getting that revenue today or tomorrow instead of, okay, well, that is settled, let's wait until we have it all settled. We might not even get it all settled for another 10, 15 years, then we're not really getting anything. My rationale is let's start chipping at the block, or at the resource revenue deal as we go along and as we start settling sections of the package, then we start taking bigger chunks out. That's the approach that I'm looking at. What about something like that? Thank you.
Robert Villeneuve on Committee Motion 48-15(5) Establishment Of A Boards And Agencies Review Unit, Carried
In the Legislative Assembly on March 7th, 2007. See this statement in context.
Committee Motion 48-15(5) Establishment Of A Boards And Agencies Review Unit, Carried
Item 16: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
March 7th, 2007
Page 1314
See context to find out what was said next.