Thank you. I can understand Mr. Handley's plight, I guess, that you don't want to switch gears while you're right in the middle of the race. I'm just saying if there are only six outstanding issues, why don't we put those issues aside and let's look at the issues that they've settled on and get an interim AIP signed, an AIP that's going to be open to these other outstanding issues, obviously, and move forward from there. Why can't we sign, get something with what we agree on today instead of waiting for these outstanding issues which are going to take time, and time is something people just wait to hear about these days with resource revenue sharing devolution. It's time that we just don't have. Is that a possibility? Instead of just changing the whole way we're going about things, just sort of say, okay, we'll chip away, we'll take this as is right now and we'll work for the rest later. We'll just keep working on the rest of it, but we'll start drawing our share here right today. What's wrong with that approach?
Robert Villeneuve on Committee Motion 48-15(5) Establishment Of A Boards And Agencies Review Unit, Carried
In the Legislative Assembly on March 7th, 2007. See this statement in context.
Committee Motion 48-15(5) Establishment Of A Boards And Agencies Review Unit, Carried
Item 16: Consideration In Committee Of The Whole Of Bills And Other Matters
March 7th, 2007
Page 1314
See context to find out what was said next.