Thank you, Madam Chair. This legislation is quite substantive and it's packaged nice and neat now, but it went through lots of discussions and reviews and amendments in the public process and the committee process. As the Minister mentioned in his statement, I think it was a very good productive working process. I just want to ask a question following up on the questions from the Member from Kam Lake. I'm glad he raised that here, because it's something that he raised I believe during the committee process as well. We have received communications from the Construction Association on that. I believe we had a presentation from an individual who is associated with the Construction Association, as well, about the definition of construction. So just to put it on record, could I ask the Minister or his officials whether or not, in his opinion, that the changes that they're making with respect to the definition of construction, whether it's worker construction or construction or however they're doing it, that that will address, then, some of the concerns that they had. I think that the Minister is aware of the fact that we have had recent examples of where an employer of a plumber who went to work at a construction site got caught up in that cross-jurisdiction situation. Thank you.