Mr. Chairman, thank you. No, I don't think it's too much to ask if committee could see the detail of this proposed trip. I'm certainly prepared to provide that. I indicated earlier that this was really focused on businesspeople and primarily they are the folks that are travelling. For instance, NTCL is very interested in some Chinese manufacturing opportunities, transporting modules down from Tuk and through the Mackenzie to the oil sands. Aurora Village and Aurora World will be present; obviously interested in diversifying their aurora tourism business from just Japanese. A couple of lodges, Watta Lake Lodge and Mackay Lake Lodge interested in, again, as we talk about nature-based tourism, ecotourism, adventure tourism and seeing if we can attract a Chinese market, and there are a few others, Mr. Chairman. I'm certainly prepared to come to committee, present the trip as proposed. The meetings and the itinerary is laid out. So I can certainly go through that with committee members. I think it's a very worthwhile trip given that time is of the essence given the pressure that our aurora tourism industry is under. So I'd be more than happy to sit down with committee members and talk about the trip program that we've built.

To the first question around the Tourism Product Diversification and Marketing Program, I have to apologize to committee for not coming back to committee after Cabinet approval late in July. We knew that there wasn't much time before the supp would see the House. We were on a very compressed schedule, but it was in fact committee's urging and questioning of me in front of committee and in the House about whether or not our Tourism 2010 targets were achievable given the pressure that we had seen that the consumptive tourism industry was under. There were questions and urging to broaden out and diversify and look at some of the nature-based tourism and take advantage of some of our obvious ecotourism advantages in the Northwest Territories. So we were trying to respond as quickly as we possibly could. I don't know if this will be, in the end, enough money. I think it's a very good start. I think future governments will have to assess and take a look at the targets and see whether or not we're meeting those, but I think, again, this is a good expenditure. It is in response to committee's urging both in the House and in front of committee and I only apologize that we weren't able to come back to committee after getting the approval in Cabinet and realized that the first you've seen of it was in committee and then this discussion on the floor of the House. So that certainly is my failing in that respect and I hope that you can see that the program is worthwhile though. Thank you.