Thank you, Mr. Chair. I am going to be voting against the motion. As far as I am concerned, if the communication plan didn't work out in this particular case, I don't want to put the whole plan at risk. We should write maybe a strongly worded letter, but the bottom line is if we put our industries at risk, take our aurora industry, they are barely surviving as it is and here they are trying to open up new markets. For over three and a half years, I have been saying let's find new opportunities and try to expand it. Yet, here we are saying no when they are looking at a new opportunity and trying to build some bridges. As far as I am concerned, if we can get everybody working, it will help support the investment we have here on the ground.
As far as transportation logistics, I have even heard of the mini airline groups' interest in this opportunity. Although it doesn't sound like it from Minister Bell's description when he said NTCL is going, that doesn't sound like one of the airlines. But at the end of the day, I would encourage him to reconsider so we can get some airline groups in there.
As far as I am concerned, I think it has merit and it's a mistake to say no. I think it's okay to put more demands on this and find a way to get those demands realized, but the fact is saying no to this opportunity right now may be a mistake when our tourism industry is hemorrhaging in the sense of lost opportunities. It wasn't that long ago we were losing the hunting of caribou and now aurora is falling apart. How much more of our tourism industry do we have to lose before someone realizes its tomorrow's opportunity? So we need to be doing that today. Thank you.