I guess I don’t quite understand what the definition of significant renovations is. I mean, in 2002–2003 they redid that entire basement. It’s quite nice. It’s got one of the largest boardrooms in it, completely rigged out: nice tables, everything. It looks fantastic. I think that cost about $300,000 and some.
I know they’ve done a lot of work on the second floor. You go into the main floor where the student financial assistance is. It’s quite nice in there. They’ve got all the fancy new desks, and they’ve got a whole new area set up for their computer people. It looks pretty good every time I go in there. It’s put together quite nicely. The third floor was renovated a couple of years ago, as well. They’ve put over $900,000 in renovations into that building since 2002-2003, so I’m kind of surprised by the comment that it has had no significant renovations.
I’d be curious about what it is they’re doing and why in times of cuts we need to keep moving forward and buying fancy new desks and making buildings look fantastic and pretty, when all they have to be is functional and usable. It seems a little odd, so I guess my question is: what do they have to do that is different than what they’ve done since 2002-2003, 2003-2004, and on and on and on? They’ve done renovations in that building almost every year.