Thank you to the Minister for those remarks and pointing out that support. I was using the terminology that has been used by others. It’s good to have the words “maintaining funding” defined to include the 3 per cent.
On the YACCS situation, as I have mentioned before in the House YACCS has applied for forced-growth costs for fuel and utilities and so on and been declined. But it’s ultimately been recovered through deficit funding from the Yellowknife Health and Social Services Authority, who then has to go into deficit themselves and seek recovery of it. This has been going on for a few years. I’m wondering, and this is probably traumatic for all, if that’s not something that could be addressed progressively and brought into the fold so it’s not always on a deficit basis. It would be easier for all.