Would the Minister have any thoughts as to, now, if we distribute the duties, we’re now creating similar jobs? In other departments, I see that, you know, when jobs are all similar and they don’t just point the finger at one person; they — whether I agree or disagree — they…. When you’re losing one position out of a group of positions, you get everyone to apply. Therefore, you still keep the best and most qualified staff on strength.
I’m just wondering if that approach is being reconsidered in this particular case, because that sounds like we’ve taken one job; we’ve given people their duties. But we’re now telling them that they can’t apply for the job. We’ve just sort of given the job to someone else. I guess I’m just trying to understand that methodology.