Thank you, Mr. Chair. I’ll actually do a little bit of an explanation of the decrease from what was in the Revised Mains to the 2008–2009 Mains. It was referenced, that decrease of $540,000.
In supp 1, we received some funding under the Alternative Energy Program. That was for $450,000, and $300,000 of that was loaded into the contribution budget from the supp.
In the 2008–2009 Mains, we still have $450,000 for the Alternative Energy Program; however, $150,000 of that is in Contributions. Some is in Grants and Contributions, and some is in O&M. So the overall funding for that program didn’t change.
Part of the reason for the load with the supp is, quite often, when we get supplementary approval for funding, we don’t have it exact. When the budget gets loaded, it quite often gets loaded in one location and may be transferred or utilized in other ways.
The Energy Efficiency Incentive Program: in the 2007–2008 supp we received $800,000, and in 2008–2009 it has decreased to $300,000. With that original $800,000, $400,000 of it was GNWT-funded; the other $400,000 came from the ecoTrust.
Then in 2008–2009 the GNWT portion remained the same. The ecoTrust portion was decreased to $100,000. As well, we did the other decrease of $200,000, and that, as explained by the Minister, was a result of the under-subscription to that program.
For all the other programs — Energy Guide; the funding to the Arctic Energy Alliance — funding has remained the same. We received an additional $110,000 for the wood pellet pilot project.
I hope I haven’t confused you too much.