Thank you, Mr. Chairman. We don’t see any potential for market disruption in this case. There is very little vacant space. It’s not the same as the comparison that was made with Yellowknife, where there is vacant space, and in order to undertake a project of this nature, we would be disrupting the market by not providing opportunity for the proponents that had space. In this case we have a number of buildings we’re housing our employees in, some with structural problems; for example, the Perry Building that was referenced. There is limited occupancy there. The landlord has discontinued maintenance on this building, and we’re facing potential eviction. There are other facilities that are located in inadequate space, which I mentioned earlier.
We don’t see the market disruption as an issue, because there are really virtually no other accommodations we can utilize. We have had these discussions, as I mentioned earlier, with other developers and have given them the reassurance that we will continue to lease and rent the same amount of space we currently do. I don’t see how we can be disrupting the market.