Mr. Chairman, this section of implementation follows the negotiation phase in signing of agreements. Although the Member talks about the intent of the negotiations and then implementing those agreements, our goal within Aboriginal Affairs, as I spoke to it the last time it was sitting at the table here, when it comes to training programs in the opening comments, we are trying to recruit aboriginal people to become involved in our negotiation process so that they are familiar with what they are dealing with and as much as even in the implementation side. Implementation side becomes one of the languages itself that were there. Not everybody in the future years will have experience at the table as the

Member does. It will rely on what words are put in those agreements that give clarity to how things would be implemented. I think that is going to be really important.

On this section, we feel that the implementation side is fairly straightforward. When it comes to the negotiation side, that is one of the reasons we have applied or come back to the table for more revenues through this process, because we feel, with the additional tables, we need more human resources in a sense of dealing with the actual negotiation tables that are coming up. As I informed Members, there are times that we have negotiators hold two different tables, sometimes three in a couple of cases. The workload is there. We know we have to put a bit more resources at the table and this budget, if approved, permits that. Thank you.