Thank you for that information. I have seen the display. It is pretty clear.

My last question has to do with the milk levy or the milk deposit that we are talking about. I have received the response from the Minister, which basically suggests it is going to be $20 a year in the way of the portion of the deposit that you don’t get back, which doesn’t sound significant but we do continually talk about the cost of milk and other fresh vegetables as an example. Anything that we are doing to increase the cost of milk, I think we have to think about it hard before we make a final decision on that. I am not saying that the deposit on milk is wrong, considering that you are going to get half back, but I just want to make sure that we are content with the fact that we are going to be increasing the cost of milk in the communities.

I would like to just throw out there a possible alternative. Sugar drinks aren’t necessarily good for you. All the pops and the juices that are really high in sugar are bad. They seem to be very popular and

people continue to buy them. Has there been any thought about maybe increasing the deposit on that and eliminating a deposit on milk but still providing the incentive to recycle the milk? Maybe go with a 10 cent deposit on milk which is fully refundable, but cover the difference that we need to raise to make this doable financially by increasing the deposit on some of the sugar drinks, which would really be great if we encourage people not to drink it. Has the Minister considered options like that? Thank you, Mr. Chairman.