So that infers that the worker’s advocate was in a position to give legal advice as opposed to the current situation. Is that correct? And if so, I would ask why this government is taking away from the rights of an injured worker. Obviously with an injury there is reduced capacity for income and a reduced ability to go out and seek and pay for legal advice on their own. This is the situation of many of my constituents, or those that come to me with these issues. I’d like clarification on that.