Again, going back to the original questions, I think that, as part of our Highway Strategy, we do have to have some sort of a policy in place to allow to look at things such as P3s in regards to sort of the Deh Cho Bridge or even the Mackenzie Highway. That has to be an option or an alternative. I know we don’t have the capital dollars to do all of these things. I think that we have to find a way to finance it, knowing that we don’t have tens of millions of dollars. We need to do all these things, but I think we do have to look at alternative ways of financing projects.

I was in Manitoba with other Members of the House where we drove on a highway which was built on behalf of the hydro company -- some 50 kilometres, which was surprising. It was $25 million, which up here is about $1 million a kilometre. I think that it is something that we have to look at again. It was a P3. I think we have to find ways of delivering on these things, but, more importantly, do it within sight of the existing government policies and the financial abilities of this government to deliver on those things. I think also it has to be part of the long-term strategy of the government. I would just like to know, knowing that we have the Deh Cho Bridge project in place -- it is one of the options that we have looked at -- how do we implement that through the NWT Highway Strategy to eventually replace ferry operations with permanent bridges?