Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I appreciate that there is a lot of work that has to be done. I appreciate that the capital plan is developed based on infrastructure needs in various and sundry places and communities, but I am sure the Minister can appreciate that different Members have a different identification or a different definition of what need is in their community. I am a little concerned that there is no opportunity before sort of the list is finalized for Members to provide input to the developers of this particular list of particular items which they feel are needed in their riding or their community. I guess I would like to ask the Minister if there is an opportunity for Members to
provide input on a particular project which they, as Members, or their riding or community feels is absolutely necessary, that it could be thrown into the mix and considered at the same time that the capital plan is considered based on the guidelines that are there.
I want to say that I believe in those guidelines that are there. I think they are good. I think the process is good, but I think there also needs to be an opportunity for Members to put forward pet projects or wish list projects which very often don’t ever get to the list. Thank you.