Thank you, Mr. Chair. I was going to ask some questions and then we were on the wrong page, so I held off.

On this section I’m also a little sad to see that there is no reference to J.H. Sissons. It is a school that’s quite old, clearly in need of some modifications. I understand that it’s being done as part of the facility review. The reason I was going to ask this question in the last section is I’m not suggesting that this is maybe the best use of that facility, but I understand that enrolment levels are going down in Yellowknife. I also understand that enrolment at Sissons is quite low and if we’re trying to maximize the use of our facilities, if we’re trying to gain the maximum benefit for every dollar, maybe, maybe it’s time to consider changing the use of a building like Sissons and possibly, maybe, that should be our Yellowknife Campus. If we have to do a bunch of modifications to that building anyway, I’d like to see it as part of the facilities review that that is maybe considered as an option. It may not be appropriate, but unless we do the review or study on it, we won’t know. If we only have 50 percent capacity in that building right now as a school, and we could fit kids in different buildings, maybe it is time to start thinking outside the box a little bit and whatnot. I guess it is more of a suggestion that when you are doing your facilities review, to consider possibilities, to consider options that we haven’t considered before and think about something like Sissons as possibly a Yellowknife Campus.

I guess that is more of a comment, but it needs to be fixed up. Maybe we could kill two birds with one stone here. I would be interested to hear what the Minister had to say.