Again, Mr. Chair, getting back to my original point in regard to unforeseen events, like I mentioned, the shoreline erosion communities, one of the biggest challenges the communities are going to face, especially in the Arctic, is permafrost. We can see what permafrost is doing to communities such as Inuvik in regard to the infrastructure from roads to public buildings. For us, that cost is an unforeseen cost. That cost is not part of the capital expenditure funds that were given to communities. The formula funding does not contemplate what that is and we realize that could be in the billions of dollars. I think for this government to totally not apply it under this situation is...We realize that that is the reality of what’s going to happen in the Arctic. I’d just like

assurance from the government that as part of the planning process, you also realize that you cannot leave that situation to be resolved solely by the communities, and this government has to take the responsibility of ensuring that we do have the ability, as not only government but as communities, to take on this threat that we all live with in regard to global warming, climate change, melting permafrost and, basically, the effect it’s having on public infrastructure, not just highways and airports and government infrastructure but community infrastructure. Thank you.