I would just see it as in everyone’s interest if this question was posed to individuals. When I say “individuals,” I mean individual tables, that is, but I would see this question to everyone’s benefit if it is posed individually on their own timetable, that is if they would be interested in

advancing their own negotiations. As well as the fact that could the territorial government find a capacity to support this? I would be surprised that there would be very few people not willing to consider this as a viable direction. I would be very surprised if Canada felt this was stalling the process or ruining it. You know, I would believe strongly that there would be an opportunity and certainly an interest from their perspective that anything to accelerate these negotiations that could bring them to a closure would be in everyone’s interest. In other words, we would have closure of agreements, as well as access to money, access to authority and access to self-determination. So, Mr. Chairman, from my perspective, and certainly one that’s been encouraged to me by many people is the real question, is what’s stopping an accelerated program considering that we have a number of agreements that we could agree and few outstanding issues we could deal with separately? Thank you.