Mahsi, Mr. Chair. The quick answer is most definitely yes, because those officers that need to go to the communities without detachments, such as Wrigley or Tsiigehtchic, we definitely need to work out some agreement in that area. We want to have more presence in the community by RCMP, but sometimes there’s no accommodation. If they provide accommodation, it’s not suitable to their standards as well. So we have to identify the specs as well. When I was talking about the infrastructure, that also includes the detachment where it has to be according to the “G” Division specs on the detachment as well. But, Mr. Chair, yes, I’ll continue to work with the NWT Housing Corporation in this area.
Jackson Lafferty on Committee Motion 30-16(4): Transportation, Operations Expenditures – Provision Of Quarterly Updates On Status Of Deh Cho Bridge Project, Carried
In the Legislative Assembly on February 23rd, 2010. See this statement in context.
Committee Motion 30-16(4): Transportation, Operations Expenditures – Provision Of Quarterly Updates On Status Of Deh Cho Bridge Project, Carried
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters
February 22nd, 2010
See context to find out what was said next.