Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I’m certainly supportive of the bridge and I see this as a 9 percent overrun and we need to address that sort of in the public context, which is going through and I can understand that. Anybody who has any experience with any works projects understand overruns, as unfortunate as it is, it is certainly not uncommon, especially in a public context.

I’m wondering if the Minister of Finance would be opposed to a suggestion of quarterly updates to the Priorities and Planning committee. Would he have any thought on that, because that’s really, from my constituent point of view, that’s one of the big fundamentals, is keeping a close eye on the project. I know the Minister can only do his sort of fullness and timed responses, you know, is the best we can do sort of context of will this project be managed well, of course it will, you know, those types of statements. But the fear from a Regular Member point of view on my particular position is what do we do to make sure the project stays on the rails. So how would the Minister feel about quarterly updates to the Priorities and Planning committee meeting to make sure that the detail of the finances are kept up regularly to Regular Members through the Priorities and Planning? Would he be opposed to that? Thank you.