I’m not sure if I understand the question. I’d like to give our public a lot more credit
than what the Member is suggesting. I think if you see the material on the website, it’s quite plainly written. There will be a facilitator at the meeting that will present the facts. We’re not going to tell people to interpret. We will present the facts and then engage in a dialogue, very much like what we did with the standing committee and very much like what we did, I believe, with the public working group. You lay out the facts and then ask the people for their input. The facts are important, because people need something to base their input processing rather than asking just open-ended questions. But really, we are interested in hearing from the people and giving them the facts for them to discuss. Thank you.