The Member uses an example of Wrigley, for example, of having no nurse located in that community, but there are medical services provided to residents within that community, not the same as Yellowknife residents, not the same as residents from Inuvik, but on a level that we can provide those services with an aim to improve them. For example, that’s why the Foundation for Change comes into mind. It is through the business planning cycle -- and that’s a four-year cycle that we’ve initiated in this government -- to look at the way we deliver programs and services across the North and how we would engage residents in that delivery and trying to enhance that.

Ultimately, it comes back down to sustainability. That’s one of the factors we have to take into consideration. There are far more requests on the table than we have resources to be able to implement, so we have to come up with that right balance.

Is there a policy that could be developed? Well, Mr. Speaker, there is potential for that, but I would not say it should be a Cabinet coming up with that. That needs the direction of a government commitment overall in our consensus style. That means Members need to also put on the table and we know, for example, when we set our vision and goals to try to compromise to all the needs of 19 Members as we come forward, it’s very difficult to come up then with specific measures that we can all be held to account on. Thank you.