Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I guess some of the fundamental questions I really have, have to do with what’s actually changed. You know,

I see this as we head out in two processes. The first one being the idea one that obviously isn’t going to happen, which was everything was funded and paid through the Deh Cho Bridge Corporation and obviously that isn’t going to work, but fundamentally the payments I thought the government would be responsible and paying for would be somewhat similar if we ended up being in the circumstance that we are in today. So in other words, now that we’ve taken the debt on directly, we’ve taken the payments on directly, but I guess our contribution and our commitment, in theory, if I understand it correctly, hasn’t changed. So can the Premier or the Minister of Transportation explain to me if anything’s actually changed to our theoretic bottom line, and I’m not referring to our debt wall in this particular case, I’m referring to our payment schedule or commitments that the territorial government would have been directly related to and responsible for. So has anything changed now that the obligation of the loan is directly on the shoulders of the territorial government? Thank you, Mr. Chair.