I think the Minister cited the $15 million extra, and if I heard him correctly -- and I ask him to correct me if I’m wrong -- he said that would be charged back to the project under the regulations under Section 10. It talks about the ability to have money deducted from the cost incurred by the government from the amounts payable to the concession area. I’m wondering, that $15 million that was additional because of the change in the project and the project scope that affected the project’s financial bottom line. Is it that type of section that we’ll be drawing back that $15 million? So, therefore, it’s still the $165 million bridge as we originally discussed and theoretically supported?
Robert Hawkins on Committee Motion 1-16(5): Extension Of Sitting Hours To Conclude Td 8-16(5), Supplementary Appropriation No. 2, 2010-2011 (Infrastructure Expenditures), Carried
In the Legislative Assembly on March 23rd, 2010. See this statement in context.
Committee Motion 1-16(5): Extension Of Sitting Hours To Conclude Td 8-16(5), Supplementary Appropriation No. 2, 2010-2011 (Infrastructure Expenditures), Carried
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters
March 22nd, 2010
See context to find out what was said next.