Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Chairman, if 3.17 percent is buying some certainty for the GNWT for the long term, I’m okay with that. I think that’s actually not a bad interest rate even in today’s standards. So I guess my only question is that my fears now are not so much. I mean, I have fears about the cost. That’s something I have already talked about. My fears are the impacts; the impact of removing the short-term dispensation from the federal government for five years. When that gets removed and if this government is not in a position at that point to be able to assume the

roughly -- I believe the number of that was given to another colleague -- $155 million, if this government cannot assume that within the $500 million debt wall in addition to the two self-liquidating debts that are in place for the Housing Corporation and the Power Corporation, it would then become an issue. So would it be possible then for the Premier to try to get a bit of a longer term on this debt to a point where the debt would be reduced by a greater amount and then down to $155 million looking for maybe a 10-year term on this dispen... -- I’m sorry, I can’t say the word, whatever -- the special borrowing limit that’s going to be approved by the federal government and see if that would be something that’s possible as opposed to a five-year window looking at maybe 10 years down the road that would give us more opportunities, a longer term to recover. We don’t have to recover so sharply. What is the Premier’s position on maybe going for a longer term? Thank you.