Thank you. It’s sad that the Minister doesn’t realize what the main point is here, that this consultation process has been a sham and that some extremely important aspects and sources of good insight for us have been skipped over in the process. I’ve had many comments from constituents on the quality and bias, for example, of the on-line survey, and I know the Minister has received those same comments, a survey which was also difficult to fill out with complete comments. Many have noted that the survey may not have been available to seniors that don’t have computers. I’m told that the, well, I’ve concluded the results of the survey itself indicate highly equivocal responses. I’m sure the Minister must recognize that by looking at the answers, the proportions of answers, the yes or no answers provided, entirely

equivocal responses, which is exactly what you would expect from a questionnaire with ambiguous questions. Can the Minister explain how she thinks this survey was at all meaningful? Thank you.