I do appreciate what the Member is saying. The jobs or the positions or the people that are in our communities do serve in two different areas. Economically those are jobs and they have those jobs and those are important to them. Then in terms of care, it is so much more preferable for our people to be taken care of on our own. So I agree with the Member that there is room in our health care system, health and wellness, where we train and we have people in communities to take care of those who need assistance. Largely those are usually elders or they could be people with chronic conditions, they could be young people. We are having people with disabilities in small communities that need to be supported. So

going forward, looking down 20, 30 years from now Canada-wide and in the NWT, not an exception, we need to have our people taking care of our people. That happens as home care support workers, wellness workers, those actually probably would have better economic return.

Our occupancy rate then, what we think of typically from a more acute care setting, because we still don’t have a lot of registered nurses or some of the other care members, they’re usually locums or fly-in staff. I mean, even communities the size of Fort Good Hope, Tulita, Lutselk’e, already we have a lot of nurses that are not locally from there, but I think our planning going forward could have a result that goes hand in hand of providing quality care on one side to our residents who need it and then care providers being from the communities. That’s possible under our long-term care model that we have developed. Thank you.