Again, wording -- what’s in the agreement, what’s not in the agreement -- in the 1988 agreement, the devolution process was the enabling agreement signed between the federal government and the Government of the Northwest Territories to spell out exactly how the aboriginal obligations were going to be transferred. Again, that wording is not in this agreement. So why is that wording, which was used in the Dene-Metis claim and the land claims agreement to date, not entrenched in this agreement that you’re trying to sign off with the federal government?
David Krutko on Question 337-16(5): Draft Devolution Agreement-In-Principle
In the Legislative Assembly on November 4th, 2010. See this statement in context.
Question 337-16(5): Draft Devolution Agreement-In-Principle
Oral Questions
November 3rd, 2010
See context to find out what was said next.