Thank you. I can’t speak for future governments in the final decision and the final agreement process, but clearly, as we’ve done the work up to this stage it has been inclusive of all the regions, at least in the designing of the agreement-in-principle. I would say that since, even as observers, they’ve been influencing the language of the agreement-in-principle, as I’ve just responded earlier to a question. We would hope that they would be at the table to help design and impact the language that we would use going forward. Some of those things require bilateral discussions or bilateral negotiations between the GNWT and Aboriginal governments proper. Some of these are going to be federal government and Government of the Northwest Territories specifically when it comes to human resources transfers, the contract implications, pensions, and all of that would be more of a Government of the Northwest Territories/federal government discussion.
The two areas that are of particular concern when you listen to the comments being made fall under chapter 6, I believe, well, chapter 5, as Mr. Krutko discussed, but chapter 6, I believe, is another area, and then chapter 12, which talks about the negotiation of bilateral agreements. That pictures all groups in the negotiation of that piece. Thank you.