Thank you. It is a difficult position to be in, but some of my colleagues across the way were there when these decisions were made. The decision was made to change the regs the day before the concession agreement was done, which, for all intents and purposes, meant that the former government, the previous government was fully intent on getting this project done despite anything else. They wanted it done, they got it done, Mr. Speaker. What I can talk about today and I can ask the Minister this question: where does the responsibility lie for a February 2008 decision of Cabinet to change the regulations once again allowing for an indemnity in the lender protection agreement in favour of the trustee and the lenders? Whose responsibility is that, Mr. Speaker? That’s this government. Thank you.
David Ramsay on Question 564-16(5): Auditor General’s Report On Special Audit Of The Deh Cho Bridge
In the Legislative Assembly on March 2nd, 2011. See this statement in context.
Question 564-16(5): Auditor General’s Report On Special Audit Of The Deh Cho Bridge
Oral Questions (Reversion)
March 1st, 2011
See context to find out what was said next.