When the contract was awarded out to the southern company, our local contractor in Inuvik was already told that he had got the contract after the BIP was awarded to the southern company. It’s pretty mindboggling. Anyhow, how can the department justify signing off on a contract when the initial contractor, the one who had it before, is appealing the process? During the appeal process, how can this government sign off on a contract, especially when it’s going to a southern company and our northern dollars are going south? Thank you.
Alfred Moses on Question 47-17(3): Evaluating Contracts And Business Incentive Policy
In the Legislative Assembly on May 29th, 2012. See this statement in context.
Question 47-17(3): Evaluating Contracts And Business Incentive Policy
Oral Questions
May 28th, 2012
See context to find out what was said next.