Thank you for that confirmation. I guess on the Mackenzie Valley Pipeline office, I see we’ve had quite an increase over the last

couple of years. Obviously, this project is clearly shelved for the predictable future. I’m all for the Minister, let’s hope that something happens, but for the meantime we have a lot of competing demands on our resources. This would be, to me, a completely appropriate place to get the dollars for a minerals strategy. I’m wondering, I think we can use the human resources within this office in much better ways, given the Mackenzie Gas Project situation. The sign of pursuing things that are dead, or beating on a dead horse, as the expression is, are not appreciated by a public that sees a lot of competing demands for resources. We need to recognize that objectively, be prepared, and I think we’ve done an extraordinary amount of work and are prepared should the proposals get serious again, and redirect those resources in productive ways. Refusing to recognize that again is not appreciated. I welcome a response from the Minister on that.