What actually has worked to our advantage, in this particular case, for turning back the Opportunities Fund? I thought it was actually working quite well as a vehicle for lending money at a rate of 10 percent. I’m not going to question the context or phraseology of our good Finance folks, but I’m just wondering where the political discussion or the emphasis on the investment vehicle. At 10 percent return I thought that would be considered a good one. Maybe if the Minister could help me understand that particular thing, because it seemed to be an excellent vehicle for making cash for this government.
If my memory serves me correct, as well on another point, I think we’re in the range of about $8.22 million left over from that fund we got to keep. It seems as if it could generate money. Any thoughts from the Minister on that particular problem?