I guess my last question, and I’ll say with respect, of course, that I recognize the Minister’s last response. I mean, we really are talking about that kind of horse that’s since been gone for years as if it mattered on today’s debate. It’s well out of the barn, down the pasture, not even worth talking about. I appreciate that point.

I guess my last question in this particular regard, I suspect the Minister will answer it fine, but I suspect my last question will really be built around, was part of this a trade-off so we could get the extra access capital so we could get potential to use that as the Inuvik-Tuk highway? As our contribution? I mean, I’m just trying to get a sense of, don’t take shell game as a negative context, that’s not what I mean by it, but was there a bit of a shell by trading one for another and did we trade this Opportunities Fund over for the extra limit so it could be targeted at that particular initiative? Again, noting our percentage that we’re required according to the agreement, I’m just trying to get a sense, was that part of the structured reason why we did this.