Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Again, that was a decision the previous government made to get into the current contractual obligations with Ruskin. That contract follows a typical DOT contract which shifts only some of the risk to the contractor. It’s not a fixed price. There are eligible areas where we could see costs being overrun. That was a decision the previous government had made. Thank you.
David Ramsay on Question 111-17(3): Deh Cho Bridge Project Cost Overruns
In the Legislative Assembly on June 8th, 2012. See this statement in context.
Question 111-17(3): Deh Cho Bridge Project Cost Overruns
Oral Questions
June 7th, 2012
See context to find out what was said next.