Again, we’re taking the discretion of the department in terms of citing safety, and I give credit to the department for assessing that. I
just find it odd that we’re granting access to this bridge use with temporary systems in place.
My question again, and I’ll leave it at that because I know we want to move on with other questions, we are in a safety topic here. Can the Minister and the department assure that these components are not a critical element for the operation and opening of this bridge in a timely manner?