Mr. Chair, I would say that there is still a significant opportunity to get financial return on this, which will help us save money. The Capital Asset Retrofit Fund, there is lots of opportunity out there to continue to use technology. It’s not just heating technology; it’s lighting technology, it’s distribution of air, it’s all these types of things that can help reduce our costs. We may eventually hit a point where there may not be as much economic return on some of these, but we will continue to move forward with the savings that we do have.

An example of a community where the savings aren’t going to be financial savings, aren’t going to be as significant as other locations, is Norman Wells with the biomass that we’re putting in, the health centre, the school and the airport. Just the additional cost of getting the product there takes away some of our savings, but it is still worth doing. It is, at this point, still providing us a savings.

As we push out in some of these other communities where we can get supply to, I imagine some of the smaller communities are going to give us less of a return, but we are not just building it for return. There are multiple reasons why we’re doing these types of things. It’s about controlling costs. It’s about greenhouse gas emissions. It’s about better product, better opportunities. So we will continue to move forward.

As far as when we’ll hit that threshold, I can’t say. I don’t know. I would say that we’re still a ways away from that, and there’s still much we can do in the Government of the Northwest Territories before I think we actually hit that threshold the Member is talking about.