I am curious on how the department is familiar with construction techniques on this area of permafrost. As we all know, Highway No. 3 has its I’ll call it technical challenges rather than laden it with some description probably fair and certainly unfair. That said, the constant excuse I’ve heard was the reason Highway No. 3 is the way it is in its own state is the ice lenses. I believe it was interesting terminology picked out of the air a number of years ago to explain why the permafrost is fluxing and the matter of the ice lenses. Those were Department of Transportation words, so I don’t have to provide anyone further elaboration of what that means.

How do we know that our construction techniques will prove themselves of quality in nature in that particular area considering we are building a year-round road? As we heard, there is significant concern with the ground that this is going to be built on, the amount between the amount of material required and build-up. Do we have any proven techniques and where do we look to see them demonstrated that we can build a road at this price in this particular area using what techniques? Thank you.