Thank you, Mr. Chair. With regard to the comments of the Member with regard to Aurora College, funds have been identified for ’15 and ’16 to do some planning on what this expanded role for Aurora College could be.

Another priority for our capital formula: Are we failing our people? We are always open to changing

the process for the rating of projects, and certainly if that’s a recommendation coming from committee, I’m sure the government will be pleased to address that.

On Mildred Hall, the Department of Education has identified a need for renos to enhance the life of the assets and they are looking to identify funding, recognizing that there’s a lot of competition for scarce resources.

J.H. Sissons, there’s a planning study planned for this year to look at the problems or issues with J.H. Sissons.

An addictions centre, this Assembly, at the very beginning, all agreed we wouldn’t build any new addictions centres, that we would use existing facilities, and there are some plans being developed. This is an O and M issue, but after I make my comments I will ask Mr. Aumond to say a few words on that.

Stanton Territorial, there’s money identified for next year. As a government we are looking at how to approach it. We recognize that we would have to spend in the neighbourhood of $325 million to $400 million to address the Stanton Territorial renovations.

Arctic Tern, it’s a government surplus, and we are just doing work to maintain it and to see if any departments use it. If no department wants to use it, then we have a process for disposal of buildings. So, through you, Mr. Chair, I would like to ask Mr. Aumond to talk a bit about the addictions facilities.