Alternatives North raised a question about Section 53(2) where it gives Cabinet the power to prescribe fees for access to public registry. I have to agree that it sounds like a real oddity and I think that’s the way they phrased it. Essentially, public access should always be free and not requiring payments or fees. Why in the world was this in there? Thank you.
Bob Bromley on Committee Motion 40-17(5): Amendment To Clause 1 Of Bill 11, Carried
In the Legislative Assembly on March 11th, 2014. See this statement in context.
Committee Motion 40-17(5): Amendment To Clause 1 Of Bill 11, Carried
Consideration in Committee of the Whole of Bills and Other Matters
March 10th, 2014
See context to find out what was said next.