Thank you, Mr. Chair. Just to add one comment perhaps. That’s about requiring a contractor to be as cost-effective as possible. Our main objective was to ensure that the project is delivered on budget, the $299 million budget. To do that, the contractor came up with this schedule which, as the Minister pointed out, was three years of embankment followed by a year of cleanup and final surface and gravel. In order to meet that budget, he needed to have that schedule. That’s the requirement for the adjustment to the cash flow, which is a different cash flow than what we had originally proposed when DOT had schemed up that project back in March 2013 when the budget

was first approved by the Assembly. We are just looking for an adjustment to the cash flow for the project. Thank you.