Thank you, Mr. Chair. If the passive restraint program is in full effect, what we’re hearing is over 350-some thousand dollars. I guess the question is why still the overall increase overall. I mean, these are your numbers, not my numbers. We’re still at 2.9 percent in growth. I guess that’s the question. We don’t have an endless supply of money. Our revenues, as we heard from the Finance Minister, are dismal and they’re not looking any more favourable for the next two to three years. Are we going to continue to see forced growth at three or four times greater than our revenues for the next budget years?
Again, we have a Collective Agreement that’s going to be pending for next year. I know that, but at the end of the day when the dust settles, I run an equal sign on the ledger and I’m saying why are we still growing three times greater than our revenues with this department even though I’m hearing we have passive restraint. Could we have done anything more to bring that expenditure growth in line with revenue growth of the government? Thank you.